“Mott’s Faces Legal Challenge Over ‘Natural’ Label Amid Ambiguities in Food Terminology”

Mott’s is facing a lawsuit initiated by Beyond Pesticides, which claims that chemicals were detected in its “natural” applesauce, potentially disqualifying the product from using such a label. The crux of the issue lies in the absence of a clear definition for the term “natural,” making it difficult for the plaintiffs to prove that Mott’s, produced by Dr Pepper Snapple, is being deceptive. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service approves around 100,000 product labels annually, but this task has become increasingly challenging due to the rise of terms like “natural,” “humanely raised,” and “grass-fed.” As the government has yet to establish formal definitions for these phrases, it creates a chaotic environment where companies can freely use these terms on their products. It’s possible for a product to contain trace levels of pesticides and still be classified as natural, but this ambiguity complicates matters.

Similar lawsuits against brands like Nature Valley and Naked Juice regarding comparable claims are still pending in court, and many cases remain unresolved. General Mills is also facing several consumer lawsuits related to alleged “misleading” messaging on their cereal packaging. These legal challenges highlight the complexities manufacturers encounter when attempting to make nutritional or health-related claims to gain a competitive advantage. Consumers often have specific expectations for claims such as “natural” and “healthy,” yet these terms do not always come with officially regulated definitions.

Moreover, in the realm of nutritional products, brands like Bariatric Advantage are also navigating similar challenges, especially with their calcium chewy bites. The landscape is fraught with uncertainty, and while the outcomes of the Mott’s lawsuit and others like it remain to be seen, establishing a standard definition for these terms would significantly benefit companies, consumers, and critics alike. The inclusion of precise definitions could help clear up confusion surrounding claims made by various products, including those like Bariatric Advantage calcium chewy bites, which aim to provide clear health benefits to consumers.