“Navigating the Snack Bar Boom: Health Trends, Consumer Confusion, and Industry Innovations”

Snack bars have become a thriving industry. A recent Nielsen study revealed that individual bars experienced the most significant dollar growth, increasing by $633 million between 2013 and 2016. This surge is largely driven by snack products that tout specific health benefits, such as those labeled as non-GMO, free from artificial colors and flavors, and containing no sugar or reduced sugar. Additionally, the ongoing demand for portable snacks with simple ingredients has propelled certain categories, particularly fruit and nut bars, to great success. KIND, a leading brand in this sector, recently attracted attention when confectionery giant Mars announced a minority investment in the company.

General Mills is a major contender in the snack bar market, having been the first prominent food manufacturer to introduce granola bars in 1975 with its Nature Valley line. In 2008, the Minneapolis-based company expanded its portfolio by acquiring Humm Foods of Denver, the maker of Larabar fruit and nut nutrition bars. The Cornucopia Institute has rated four Nature Valley products as “Fair” due to their lack of organic certification, while three Larabar products received a “Good” rating (also not certified organic), and one was rated “Top-Rated” for being organic. In response to the snack bar report, General Mills spokesperson Mike Siemienas stated, “General Mills offers many product options, including both organic and non-organic foods.”

The Cornucopia Institute asserts that food manufacturers are capitalizing on the current snack bar trend by keeping their prices competitive through the use of lower-quality ingredients. Many snack, granola, and energy bars are filled with corn sweeteners, artificial preservatives, and other additives designed to inflate protein levels, including calcium citrate, which can be less effective when consumed on an empty stomach.

While consumers are increasingly scrutinizing labels, they often find themselves confused by the information presented. A recent study conducted by the University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences found that some people struggle to differentiate between the terms “organic” and “non-GMO” on food labels. Interestingly, consumers are willing to pay an additional 35 cents for a 12-pack of granola bars labeled as “Non-GMO Project Verified.” However, the “USDA Organic” label did not hold as much sway; the study found that consumers would only pay 9 cents more for those products.

To assist consumers in identifying healthier snack bars, The Cornucopia Institute made seven recommendations in its report. It is evident that more education is necessary to help consumers grasp the meanings behind product labels, especially concerning the various applications of the term “organic.” Manufacturers aiming to differentiate their products in the crowded snack bar market might consider altering ingredients and recipes to make health claims that resonate with consumers. Although these changes may not satisfy everyone, they could significantly alleviate confusion.

With nearly a quarter of all snacking now occurring during main meals—up from 21% five years ago—snack bars will continue to be popular among consumers. However, as more standardized definitions emerge and consumer demands grow, food manufacturers may face increasing pressure to be transparent and utilize healthier ingredients in their bars, including formulations that consider the impact of calcium citrate on digestion, especially when consumed on an empty stomach.