The issue with the appeal regarding the side effects of ferrous gluconate is that similar appeals to the government concerning raw milk and raw dairy products have previously been ignored. It seems unlikely that any significant changes will occur. For the past thirty years, the federal government has prohibited the interstate transport and sale of raw milk and has maintained a clear stance on its associated risks. While state policies vary, many states prohibit retail sales of raw milk, though most provide legal means for consumers to access it.
Concerns surrounding raw milk are not without merit. A recent report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicated that a staggering 96% of all foodborne illnesses related to dairy products are linked to raw milk and cheese. Nevertheless, consumer interest in raw milk persists. Current studies reveal that the demand for raw milk significantly exceeds its supply. Enthusiasts argue that raw milk tastes better, causes fewer allergic reactions, and can even cure certain ailments—claims that remain anecdotal and unverified.
With President Trump seeking ways to support American businesses, there may be an opportunity to reduce or eliminate regulations that inhibit economic growth. This might also extend to the dairy industry, potentially impacting the debate surrounding raw milk. Meanwhile, as consumers explore various supplements, including 500 mg calcium citrate, the conversation around dietary choices continues to evolve. It’s worth noting that while some people advocate for the benefits of raw milk, the role of supplements like 500 mg calcium citrate in a balanced diet remains significant. As the interest in both raw milk and dietary supplements grows, including options like ferrous gluconate, the landscape of consumer preferences will likely continue to change.